Oyindamola Jongbo Available for AI PM roles
Selected Work, 2021 — Present

Shipping AI products
that move real numbers.

I'm a technical program manager pivoting into AI Product Management. Over the last four years at Wallenius Wilhelmsen I've led the delivery of three enterprise applications — one of them AI-powered — that collectively saved over $1M annually and lifted productivity by 30%. I also teach a four-week AI Product Management course to the next cohort of PMs.

$1M/yr
Saved via AI Inspection
30%
Productivity Lift
35%
Faster Payments
01 — Work

Three products, one thesis: measurable impact over polish.

01 AI / Computer Vision

Vehicle Quality Inspection

Computer Vision Operations Damage Detection Risk Reduction
The Problem
Processed vehicles were passing through inspection with damage going undetected, resulting in downstream incident claims and penalty costs. Manual inspection was slow, inconsistent across operators, and created a bottleneck during peak volume.
Users
Quality inspectors, operations managers, and claims teams at vehicle processing centers.
My Role
Led requirements discovery, authored the PRD, defined model evaluation criteria, and aligned stakeholders across operations, data science, and claims.
Approach
Ran customer discovery sessions to map the current inspection workflow, quantify miss rates, and identify the highest-cost damage categories. Partnered with data science on training data strategy and defined success metrics weighted toward precision (false positives erode inspector trust). Built a human-in-the-loop review step so inspectors could validate and correct model outputs, creating a feedback loop that improved model accuracy over time.
Outcomes
  • $1M in annual savings from reduced incident penalties
  • Standardized inspection quality across processing centers
  • Created a structured feedback loop for continuous model improvement
  • Freed inspector capacity to focus on edge-case judgment calls
02 Workflow / Data

Customer Scheduling Application

Operations Data Capture Productivity
The Problem
Equipment processing centers were collecting scheduling and throughput data inconsistently across sites, making it impossible to forecast capacity or identify bottlenecks. Customer teams were double-booking slots and losing visibility into daily operations.
Users
Customer service teams, site operators, and planning leads across multiple processing centers.
My Role
Owned end-to-end delivery as Scrum Master and program manager. Led discovery, wrote the PRD, facilitated sprints, and managed rollout.
Approach
Interviewed operators at multiple sites to map real scheduling workflows vs. documented ones. Prioritized a minimal first release around the highest-friction touchpoint (slot booking) and layered in data capture incrementally to avoid overwhelming adoption. Partnered with change management to train users and track adoption metrics post-launch.
Outcomes
  • 30% productivity increase at processing centers
  • Unified data collection enabling capacity forecasting for the first time
  • Reduced double-bookings and scheduling conflicts
03 Automation / Finance

Freight Audit & Invoice Processing

Finance Automation Contract Validation Cash Flow
The Problem
Freight invoices were being generated manually and validated against contracts by hand, causing delayed billing cycles, disputed charges, and working-capital drag. Finance teams spent hours per week reconciling discrepancies.
Users
Finance and billing operations teams, contract managers, and accounts payable.
My Role
Program manager and business analyst. Gathered requirements, wrote the PRD, coordinated vendors, and owned change management.
Approach
Mapped the existing invoice-to-payment flow to identify where manual work was introducing delay and error. Prioritized rules-based contract validation first, with exception routing for edge cases. Defined acceptance criteria around cycle time and dispute rate, and instrumented the rollout with dashboards for finance leadership.
Outcomes
  • 35% faster payment processing
  • Reduced invoice disputes and reconciliation time
  • Improved working capital position and vendor relationships
02 — Approach

How I think about AI products.

01
Start with the cost of being wrong
Before picking a model, I ask what a false positive and a false negative actually cost the business. That decides the metric.
02
Design for the handoff
AI rarely replaces humans cleanly. I design human-in-the-loop checkpoints that build trust and generate training data simultaneously.
03
Instrument before you launch
Drift, bias, and edge cases only surface in production. Dashboards and evaluation pipelines ship on day one, not month six.
04
Adoption is the real metric
A model with 95% accuracy that nobody uses is worth zero. Change management and workflow fit get equal weight in my PRDs.